On 7/1/2013 10:49 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vi...@hp.com> writes:
On 6/30/2013 11:22 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vi...@hp.com> writes:
Hello,
Lots (~700+) of the following messages are showing up in the dmesg of a
3.10-rc1 based kernel (Host OS is running on a large socket count box
with HT-on).
[ 82.270682] PERCPU: allocation failed, size=42 align=16, alloc from
reserved chunk failed
[ 82.272633] kvm_intel: Could not allocate 42 bytes percpu data
Woah, weird....
Oh. Shit. Um, this is embarrassing.
Thanks,
Rusty.
Thanks for your response!
===
module: do percpu allocation after uniqueness check. No, really!
v3.8-rc1-5-g1fb9341 was supposed to stop parallel kvm loads exhausting
percpu memory on large machines:
Now we have a new state MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED, we can insert the
module into the list (and thus guarantee its uniqueness) before we
allocate the per-cpu region.
In my defence, it didn't actually say the patch did this. Just that
we "can".
This patch actually *does* it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au>
Tested-by: Noone it seems.
Your following "updated" fix seems to be working fine on the larger
socket count machine with HT-on.
OK, did you definitely revert every other workaround?
Yes no other workarounds were there when your change was tested.
If so, please give me a Tested-by: line...
FYI.... The actual verification of your change was done by my esteemed
colleague :Jim Hull (cc'd) who had access to this larger socket count box.
Tested-by: Jim Hull <jim.h...@hp.com>
Thanks
Vinod
Thanks,
Rusty.
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
