On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:48:27AM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: > 2013/7/9 Mark Brown <[email protected]>:
> > ...this first example is now invalid and should probably just be being > > extended with the new required properties. > Well, I have to rewrite that to make it clearer. > The thing is: > with "atmel,at91rm9200-ssc" the SSC doesn't work with DMA. > with "atmel,at91sam9g45-ssc", the SSC work ONLY with DMA. > So the dmas/dma-names properties are only required for g45-ssc, and > useless for rm9200-ssc > Maybe the best will be to write a paragraph for g45-ssc and another > for rm9200-ssc, even if there's some identical lines between them. OK, or just write a section "Required for devices with compatible X".
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
