Hi Lorenzo, On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:19:46AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:48:46AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:38:19PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:05:42PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Maxime Ripard > > > > <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > > >> The patch above should already be queued in next/dt right ? > > > > > > > > > > Indeed. > > > > > > > > > > Then why the latest patch of your patchset got in 3.10, while the > > > > > patches actually fixing the DT it would have impacted were delayed to > > > > > 3.11? > > > > > > > > > > (And why was it merged so late in the development cycle?) > > > > > > > > This. So now we have to scramble because some device trees will > > > > produce warnings at boot. > > > > > > > > Russell, the alternative is to revert Lorenzo's patch for 3.10 (and > > > > re-introduce it for 3.11). Do you have a preference? > > > > > > Sorry but I really don't understand what all the fuss in this thread > > > is about. > > > > > > This thread seems to be saying that two development patches were > > > merged, which were 7762/1 and 7763/1, and that 7764/1 is a fix? > > > Are you sure about that, because that's not how they're described, > > > and not how they look either. > > > > As Olof's warning downgrade is being merged (thanks for that and apologies > > for > > failing to explain patches dependencies properly and stable related issues), > > 7764/1 won't apply cleanly anymore. Can you please drop it from the patch > > system, I will update it and test it first thing tomorrow and send a > > final version to the patch system. > > Patch 7779/1, replacing 7764/1 is in the patch system now, and is ready > to get merged. > > Unfortunately cpu/cpus bindings documentation updates, following: > > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-June/036735.html > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-May/033779.html > > were not pulled in the kernel. This is an issue since this means that > we still have no reference in the kernel or wherever it has to be, to > the final cpus/cpu bindings for ARM and ARM64 provided in the pull > request link above (that has been reviewed to death and acknowledged). > > It is a significant overhaul of cpu/cpus bindings standard for ARM/ARM64, > covering all CPUs harking back to arm926 and beyond, and should be final. > > dts updates following that standard have already been pulled into 3.11 > through arm-soc. > > IMHO the bindings contained in pull request above must be merged in the > kernel asap, I would like to ask you please what should I do to get them in > please. If we want to move bindings documentation elsewhere let's do it, > as long as there is a published standard I am happy and will stop annoying > you with this stuff.
Just to be clear, I had no problems with the patches themselves, but just the way it was merged. That being said, I think every DTS patch you did should be merged by now, only the second patch of this serie for the A10S hasn't. Arnd, Olof, could you just apply the patch 2 for a 3.11-rc*? It's the only rc patch for the sunxi platform for now, so I don't think a pull request would be worth it, but I can send one anyway if you prefer. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature