On 07/15/2013 08:59 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > In case d_lookup() returns a dentry with d_inode == NULL, the dentry is > not returned with dput(). This results in triggering a BUG() in > shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree(): > > BUG: Dentry ...{i=0,n=...} still in use (1) [unmount of fuse fuse] > > Reported-by: Justin Clift <jcl...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> > > -- > Reproducing the BUG() on kernels with fuse that support READDIRPLUS can > be done with the GlusterFS tests: > - > http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Using_the_Gluster_Test_Framework > > After some stressing of the VFS and fuse mountpoints, bug-860663.t will > hit the BUG(). It does not happen on running this test stand-alone.
Hi Neils, FYI, this is fairly easy to reproduce on-demand with gluster: - mount a volume to two local mountpoints (i.e., I used a single storage/posix translator volume): glusterfs --volfile=./test.vol /mnt/{1,2} --use-readdirp=1 - create a negative dentry in one mountpoint: ls /mnt/1/file (results in ENOENT) - create the file via the second mountpoint: touch /mnt/2/file - run a readdirp on the first mountpoint: ls /mnt/1/ - umount /mnt/2 /mnt/1 > --- > fs/fuse/dir.c | 4 +++- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c > index 0eda527..da67a15 100644 > --- a/fs/fuse/dir.c > +++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c > @@ -1246,7 +1246,9 @@ static int fuse_direntplus_link(struct file *file, > if (err) > goto out; > dput(dentry); > - dentry = NULL; > + } else if (dentry) { > + /* this dentry does not have a d_inode, just drop it */ > + dput(dentry); > } I'm not really familiar with the dcache code, but is it appropriate to also d_invalidate() the dentry in this case (as the previous code block does)? Perhaps Miklos or somebody more familiar with dcache can confirm... Brian > > dentry = d_alloc(parent, &name); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/