On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:06:42AM +0800, Peng Tao wrote: >> From: "John L. Hammond" <[email protected]> >> >> Move the definition of struct lu_ref_link to lu_ref.h. If USE_LU_REF >> is not defined then define it to be the empty struct. Change the >> return type of lu_ref_add() and lu_ref_add_atomic() to void. Add >> lu_ref_add_at() taking same arguments as lu_ref_add() togerther with a >> pointer to a struct lu_ref_link and returning void. Adjust all >> structures containing a lu_ref_link pointer to contain a struct >> lu_ref_link instead. Use lu_ref_add_at() and lu_ref_del_at() to >> handle embedded lu_ref_links. >> >> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3059 >> Lustre-change: http://review.whamcloud.com/5920 >> Signed-off-by: John L. Hammond <[email protected]> >> Reviewed-by: Alex Zhuravlev <[email protected]> >> Reviewed-by: Jinshan Xiong <[email protected]> >> Reviewed-by: Mike Pershin <[email protected]> >> Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]> > > This patch fails to apply :( > It relies on one previous patch ([PATCH 02/48] staging/lustre/obdclass: restore lu_ref), which you have suggested to drop. I will remove unnecessary part of the patch and resend (if there's still anything left).
Thanks, Tao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
