On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 04:34:39PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote: > But your patch will run the risk to get a freed sd, since you make > 'sd_llc' wrong for a period of time (between destroy and rebuild) IMO. > > I guess I get you point, you are trying to save one time update since > you think this will be done twice, but actually the result of this two > time update was different, it's not redo and it's in order to sync > 'sd_llc' with 'rq->sd'.
Michael is right, you cannot skip update_top_cache_domain() when destroying things. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
