On Friday, July 26, 2013 02:29:40 PM Rik van Riel wrote: > On 07/26/2013 02:27 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On 7/26/2013 11:13 AM, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > >> > >> Could you try running the tests with just the repeat mode > >> stuff from commit 69a37bea excluded, but leaving the common > >> infrastructure and commit e11538? > >> > > > > personally I think we should go the other way around. > > revert the set entirely first, and now, and get our performance back > > to what it should be > > > > and then see what we can add back without causing the regressions. > > this may take longer, or be done in steps, and that's ok. > > > > the end point may well be the same... but we can then evaluate in the right > > direction. > > Works for me. I have no objection to reverting both patches, > if the people planning to fix the code prefer that :)
OK, I'll queue up the reverts as fixes for 3.11-rc4. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/