On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:40:18AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:48:26AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > > > [ I disagree about the "more thought" part. The current discussion, > > coming years too late after the introduction of DT to ARM Linux, is > > contrary evidence enough. ] > > We did have exactly the same discussion when the DT transition was > started - this isn't something that people only just realised might be > an issue. There was a deliberate decision to focus on getting the > technology deployed to the point where it could be used as a straight > replacement for board files and accept that sometimes the results won't > be perfect and that we may need to rework as a result.
Can you tell a bit more about this decision? When was it made? Who made it? How was it made public? Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
