On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:25:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:16:44PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > > > Pointing it to a dummy work callback is cleaner than taking > > special cases in the code to bypass the flush_delayed_work_sync(). > > Why is this better than pointing at the normal work that you'd expect to > be used there?
By 'normal work' do you mean the close_delayed_work() used for standard PCM DAIs? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
