On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:13:52PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:25:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Why is this better than pointing at the normal work that you'd expect to > > be used there? > By 'normal work' do you mean the close_delayed_work() used for > standard PCM DAIs? Yes - making up this empty work doesn't seem like a robust approach.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
