On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:38:57 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> Subject: sched, numa: Use {cpu, pid} to create task groups for shared faults
> From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> Date: Tue Jul 30 10:40:20 CEST 2013
>
> A very simple/straight forward shared fault task grouping
> implementation.
Here is another (untested) version of task placement on top of
your task grouping. Better send it to you now, rather than on
your friday evening :)
The algorithm is loosely based on Andrea's placement algorithm,
but not as strict because I am not entirely confident that the
task grouping code works right yet...
It also has no "fall back to a better node than the current one"
code yet, for the case where we fail to migrate to the best node,
but that should be a separate patch anyway.
Subject: [PATCH,RFC] numa,sched: use group fault statistics in numa placement
This version uses the fraction of faults on a particular node for
both task and group, to figure out the best node to place a task.
I wish I had benchmark numbers to report, but our timezones just
don't seem to work out that way. Enjoy at your own peril :)
I will be testing these tomorrow.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 9e7fcfe..5e175ae 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1355,6 +1355,7 @@ struct task_struct {
* The values remain static for the duration of a PTE scan
*/
unsigned long *numa_faults;
+ unsigned long total_numa_faults;
/*
* numa_faults_buffer records faults per node during the current
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6a06bef..3ef4d45 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -844,6 +844,18 @@ static unsigned int task_scan_max(struct task_struct *p)
*/
unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_settle_count __read_mostly = 3;
+struct numa_group {
+ atomic_t refcount;
+
+ spinlock_t lock; /* nr_tasks, tasks */
+ int nr_tasks;
+ struct list_head task_list;
+
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+ atomic_long_t total_faults;
+ atomic_long_t faults[0];
+};
+
static inline int task_faults_idx(int nid, int priv)
{
return 2 * nid + priv;
@@ -857,6 +869,38 @@ static inline unsigned long task_faults(struct task_struct
*p, int nid)
return p->numa_faults[2*nid] + p->numa_faults[2*nid+1];
}
+static inline unsigned long group_faults(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
+{
+ if (!p->numa_group)
+ return 0;
+
+ return atomic_long_read(&p->numa_group->faults[2*nid]) +
+ atomic_long_read(&p->numa_group->faults[2*nid+1]);
+}
+
+/*
+ * These return the fraction of accesses done by a particular task, or
+ * task group, on a particular numa node. The group weight is given a
+ * larger multiplier, in order to group tasks together that are almost
+ * evenly spread out between numa nodes.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long task_weight(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
+{
+ if (!p->numa_faults)
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1000 * task_faults(p, nid) / p->total_numa_faults;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long group_weight(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
+{
+ if (!p->numa_group)
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1200 * group_faults(p, nid) /
+ atomic_long_read(&p->numa_group->total_faults);
+}
+
/*
* Create/Update p->mempolicy MPOL_INTERLEAVE to match p->numa_faults[].
*/
@@ -979,8 +1023,10 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env,
long imp)
cur = NULL;
if (cur) {
- imp += task_faults(cur, env->src_nid) -
- task_faults(cur, env->dst_nid);
+ imp += task_faults(cur, env->src_nid) +
+ group_faults(cur, env->src_nid) -
+ task_faults(cur, env->dst_nid) -
+ group_faults(cur, env->dst_nid);
}
trace_printk("compare[%d] task:%s/%d improvement: %ld\n",
@@ -1067,7 +1113,7 @@ static int task_numa_migrate(struct task_struct *p)
}
rcu_read_unlock();
- faults = task_faults(p, env.src_nid);
+ faults = task_faults(p, env.src_nid) + group_faults(p, env.src_nid);
update_numa_stats(&env.src_stats, env.src_nid);
for_each_online_node(nid) {
@@ -1076,7 +1122,7 @@ static int task_numa_migrate(struct task_struct *p)
if (nid == env.src_nid)
continue;
- imp = task_faults(p, nid) - faults;
+ imp = task_faults(p, nid) + group_faults(p, nid) - faults;
if (imp < 0)
continue;
@@ -1122,21 +1168,10 @@ static void numa_migrate_preferred(struct task_struct
*p)
p->numa_migrate_retry = jiffies + HZ/10;
}
-struct numa_group {
- atomic_t refcount;
-
- spinlock_t lock; /* nr_tasks, tasks */
- int nr_tasks;
- struct list_head task_list;
-
- struct rcu_head rcu;
- atomic_long_t faults[0];
-};
-
static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
{
- int seq, nid, max_nid = -1;
- unsigned long max_faults = 0;
+ int seq, nid, max_nid = -1, max_group_nid = -1;
+ unsigned long max_faults = 0, max_group_faults = 0;
seq = ACCESS_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq);
if (p->numa_scan_seq == seq)
@@ -1148,7 +1183,7 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
/* Find the node with the highest number of faults */
for (nid = 0; nid < nr_node_ids; nid++) {
- unsigned long faults = 0;
+ unsigned long faults = 0, group_faults = 0;
int priv, i;
for (priv = 0; priv < 2; priv++) {
@@ -1161,6 +1196,7 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
/* Decay existing window, copy faults since last scan */
p->numa_faults[i] >>= 1;
p->numa_faults[i] += p->numa_faults_buffer[i];
+ p->total_numa_faults += p->numa_faults_buffer[i];
p->numa_faults_buffer[i] = 0;
diff += p->numa_faults[i];
@@ -1169,6 +1205,8 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
if (p->numa_group) {
/* safe because we can only change our own
group */
atomic_long_add(diff,
&p->numa_group->faults[i]);
+ atomic_long_add(diff,
&p->numa_group->total_faults);
+ group_faults +=
atomic_long_read(&p->numa_group->faults[i]);
}
}
@@ -1176,11 +1214,29 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
max_faults = faults;
max_nid = nid;
}
+
+ if (group_faults > max_group_faults) {
+ max_group_faults = group_faults;
+ max_group_nid = nid;
+ }
}
if (sched_feat(NUMA_INTERLEAVE))
task_numa_mempol(p, max_faults);
+ /*
+ * Should we stay on our own, or move in with the group?
+ * If the task's memory accesses are concentrated on one node, go
+ * to (more likely, stay on) that node. If the group's accesses
+ * are more concentrated than the task's accesses, join the group.
+ *
+ * max_group_faults max_faults
+ * ------------------ > ------------
+ * total_group_faults total_faults
+ */
+ if (group_weight(p, max_group_nid) > task_weight(p, max_nid))
+ max_nid = max_group_nid;
+
/* Preferred node as the node with the most faults */
if (max_faults && max_nid != p->numa_preferred_nid) {
@@ -1242,6 +1298,7 @@ void task_numa_group(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int
pid)
atomic_set(&grp->refcount, 1);
spin_lock_init(&grp->lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&grp->task_list);
+ atomic_long_set(&grp->total_faults, 0);
spin_lock(&p->numa_lock);
list_add(&p->numa_entry, &grp->task_list);
@@ -1336,6 +1393,7 @@ void task_numa_fault(int last_cpupid, int node, int
pages, bool migrated)
BUG_ON(p->numa_faults_buffer);
p->numa_faults_buffer = p->numa_faults + (2 * nr_node_ids);
+ p->total_numa_faults = 0;
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
