Op 07-08-13 02:05, Dave Airlie schreef:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:13:41AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>> The check needs to be for > 1, because ctx->acquired is already incremented.
>>> This will prevent ww_mutex_lock_slow from returning -EDEADLK and not locking
>>> the mutex. It caused a lot of false gpu lockups on radeon with
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH=y because a function that shouldn't be able
>>> to return -EDEADLK did.
>>>
>>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@canonical.com>
> Should this be merged via Ingo? or will I queue it in my -fixes?
>
> Dave.
>
It's in tip:core/urgent, so I imagine you don't need to queue it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/