On 08/09/2013 02:23 AM, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 07:46:53AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> One thing which would probably be worthwhile tho is getting rid of the
>> bitmap based qc tag allocator in libata. That one is just borderline
>> stupid to keep around on any setup which is supposed to be scalable.
>
> Hi Tejun,
>
> How about this approach?
>
> @@ -5639,6 +5627,12 @@ struct ata_port *ata_port_alloc(struct ata_host *host)
> if (!ap)
> return NULL;
>
> + ap->qc_tags = blk_mq_init_tags(ATA_MAX_QUEUE, 1, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> + if (!ap->qc_tags) {
> + kfree(ap);
> + return NULL;
> + }
This should be blk_mq_init_tags(ATA_MAX_QUEUE - 1, 1, ...) since the
total depth is normal_tags + reserved_tags. Apart from that, I think it
looks alright based on a cursory look.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
