On 08/12/2013 06:03 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> >>> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to >>> wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has >>> never been tested before so the tick broadcast code is not handling this >>> case properly IMHO. >>> >> >> If you have a per-cpu tick device that isn't suffering from >> FEAT_C3_STOP why wouldn't you use that for the tick versus a >> per-cpu tick device that has FEAT_C3_STOP? It sounds like there >> is a bug in the preference logic or you should boost the rating >> of the arm global timer above the twd. Does this patch help? It >> should make the arm global timer the tick device and whatever the >> cadence timer you have into the broadcast device. > > I finally got to test your patch. Unfortunately, it makes the system > hang even earlier:
[ ... ] Can you boot with maxcpus=1 and then give the result of timer_list ? -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/