On Monday, August 12, 2013 11:18:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Currently prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: > > int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, > unsigned int relation); > > And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid > index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they > don't use target_freq and relation after it. > > So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling > cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can > be > done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. > For > others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers > are converted to expose frequency tables. > > So, in order not to break those special drivers first patch renames > ->target() to > ->target_old() and the following patches will define the new prototype and > convert existing drivers one by one.
Super-ugly. Please just keep the old .target() as is, add a new callback and switch the suitable drivers to using it. You may call the new one .target_index() or something along these lines. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
