3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrey Vagin <ava...@openvz.org>
commit 3e6b11df245180949938734bc192eaf32f3a06b3 upstream.
struct memcg_cache_params has a union. Different parts of this union
are used for root and non-root caches. A part with destroying work is
used only for non-root caches.
I fixed the same problem in another place v3.9-rc1-16204-gf101a94, but
didn't notice this one.
This patch fixes the kernel panic:
[ 46.848187] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 000000fffffffeb8
[ 46.849026] IP: [<ffffffff811a484c>]
kmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children+0x6c/0xc0
[ 46.849092] PGD 0
[ 46.849092] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
...
Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <ava...@openvz.org>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glom...@openvz.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsinghar...@gmail.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebni...@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3186,11 +3186,11 @@ int memcg_register_cache(struct mem_cgro
if (!s->memcg_params)
return -ENOMEM;
- INIT_WORK(&s->memcg_params->destroy,
- kmem_cache_destroy_work_func);
if (memcg) {
s->memcg_params->memcg = memcg;
s->memcg_params->root_cache = root_cache;
+ INIT_WORK(&s->memcg_params->destroy,
+ kmem_cache_destroy_work_func);
} else
s->memcg_params->is_root_cache = true;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
