3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com>

commit c319d50bfcf678c2857038276d9fab3c6646f3bf upstream.

This is similar to the race Linus had reported, but in this case
it's an older bug: nl80211_prepare_wdev_dump() uses the wiphy
index in cb->args[0] as it is and thus parses the message over
and over again instead of just once because 0 is the first valid
wiphy index. Similar code in nl80211_testmode_dump() correctly
offsets the wiphy_index by 1, do that here as well.

Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 net/wireless/nl80211.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -471,10 +471,12 @@ static int nl80211_prepare_wdev_dump(str
                        goto out_unlock;
                }
                *rdev = wiphy_to_dev((*wdev)->wiphy);
-               cb->args[0] = (*rdev)->wiphy_idx;
+               /* 0 is the first index - add 1 to parse only once */
+               cb->args[0] = (*rdev)->wiphy_idx + 1;
                cb->args[1] = (*wdev)->identifier;
        } else {
-               struct wiphy *wiphy = wiphy_idx_to_wiphy(cb->args[0]);
+               /* subtract the 1 again here */
+               struct wiphy *wiphy = wiphy_idx_to_wiphy(cb->args[0] - 1);
                struct wireless_dev *tmp;
 
                if (!wiphy) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to