On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:28:32PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 08:24:11PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:37:17PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > This series provides a few documentation updates: > > > > > > 1. Update rcu_barrier() documentation to note that it no longer is > > > guaranteed to wait for a full grace period. This guarantee was > > > a victim of energy efficiency. > > > > > > 2. Update RTFP documentation. > > > > > > 3. Fix a control-dependency example in the memory-barriers > > > documentation. > > > > > > Changes from v1 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/17/94): > > > > > > o Apply Josh Triplett review comments. > > > > Consider changing the patch tag for new versions, to "PATCH v2" or > > similar; that way, all of the patches have a clearly distinct subject > > for the new version. > > > > git format-patch will do this for you; just pass "-v 2". > > Good point, my email client got them confused as well. My version of git > format-patch does not know about "-v 2", but --subject-prefix="PATCH v2" > does fine. I am using git version 1.8.1.5, for whatever it is worth.
I have 1.8.4.rc3, which has -v. - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
