Hello, Kent. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:01:32PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > I think Tejun and I might be at a bit of an impasse with the ida rewrite > itself, but I don't think there were any outstanding objections to the > percpu ida code itself - and this is a standalone version.
The percpu ida code can be applied separately from the ida rewrite? > I was meaning to ask you Andrew, if you could take a look at the ida > discussion and lend your opinion - I don't think there's any _specific_ > technical objections left to my ida code, and it's now on a more > philisophical "complexity vs. ..." level. Hmmm... the objection was pretty specific - don't depend on high-order or vmalloc allocations when it can be easily avoided by using proper radix tree. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
