On Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:18:49PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his > > > choice. That's the end of the story. > > > > Just to clarify: I don't want to take the patch for a reason, not just > > because of my mood today. Once the patch comes in combination with another > > patch (or a plan) that actually makes use of the wrapper function, then > > I'd happily apply/ack it. > > > > This is the same story as global checkpatch.pl fixes: they are more harm > > than good, and without the actual use of the dev_get_platdata(), the patch > > falls into "global checkpatch.pl fixes" category. > > If you view this as a checkpatch.pl fixup, I'll be glad to take it > through my tree instead, to ease the patch burden on you :)
Hi Greg, I agree with you. Thank you for your suggestion. :-) Best regards, Jingoo Han -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
