On 09/03/2013 07:31 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> This patch converts the Tegra114 gate clock registration to be table driven
> like the periph clocks. The same struct tegra_periph_init_data is used for the
> table, but some fields are unused. This makes the code easier to read and also
> paves the way to share clock data between Tegra SoCs.

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c 
> b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c

> +static const char *clk_32k[] = {
> +     "clk_32k",
> +};


I think those new arrays of strings are only used ...

> @@ -2114,6 +2023,26 @@ static __init void tegra114_periph_clk_init(void 
> __iomem *clk_base)

> +     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra_periph_gate_clk_list); i++) {
> +             int reg_bank;
> +
> +             data = &tegra_periph_gate_clk_list[i];
> +             reg_bank = get_reg_bank(data->periph.gate.clk_num);
> +
> +             if (reg_bank >= 0) {
> +                     clk = tegra_clk_register_periph_gate(data->name,
> +                                     data->parent_names[0],

... here. If so, why make them arrays? Surely they could just be a const
char * inside tegra_periph_gate_clk_list[i]?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to