On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 05:15:16PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 01:11:18 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > index a6d098c..3750360 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > @@ -1356,6 +1356,23 @@ ftrace_hash_rec_disable(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int
> > filter_hash);
> > static void
> > ftrace_hash_rec_enable(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int filter_hash);
> >
> > +static int ftrace_convert_size_to_bits(int size)
> > +{
> > + int bits;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Make the hash size about 1/2 the # found
> > + */
> > + for (size /= 2; size; size >>= 1)
> > + bits++;
> > +
> > + /* Don't allocate too much */
> > + if (bits > FTRACE_HASH_MAX_BITS)
> > + bits = FTRACE_HASH_MAX_BITS;
> > +
> > + return bits;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Just found this bug. Strange that gcc never gave me a warning :-/
I can't give gcc too much trouble, as I also didn't give you an
uninitialized-variable warning.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
