On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 21:51:52 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:
 
> > >  void ftrace_unsafe_rcu_checker_disable(void)
> > >  {
> > >   atomic_inc(&ftrace_unsafe_rcu_disabled);
> > > + /* Make sure the update is seen immediately */
> > > + smp_wmb();
> > 
> >     smp_mb__after_atomic_inc()?
> 
> Yep.
> 
> > 
> > >  }
> > > 
> > >  void ftrace_unsafe_rcu_checker_enable(void)
> > >  {
> > >   atomic_dec(&ftrace_unsafe_rcu_disabled);
> > > + /* Make sure the update is seen immediately */
> > > + smp_wmb();
> > 
> >     smp_mb__after_atomic_dec()?
> 
> Yep.
> 
> > 
> > >  }
> > > 
> > >  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, ftrace_rcu_func);
> > > @@ -588,15 +593,14 @@ static void
> > >  ftrace_unsafe_callback(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> > >                  struct ftrace_ops *op, struct pt_regs *pt_regs)
> > >  {
> > > - int bit;
> > > -
> > > + /* Make sure we see disabled or not first */
> > > + smp_rmb();
> > 
> >     smp_mb__before_atomic_inc()?
> 
> Yep.
> 
> I'll update it and restart my tests.
> 

Although, this will punish archs that need the mb(), as IIUC, smp_mb()
is heavier weight than smp_wmb() or smp_rmb().

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to