Ksoftirqd shouldn't need softirq stack since it's executing in a kernel thread with a callstack that is only beginning at this stage.
Lets comment about that for clarity. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> Cc: James Hogan <[email protected]> Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <[email protected]> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]> Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> --- kernel/softirq.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c index 657e047..1de0322 100644 --- a/kernel/softirq.c +++ b/kernel/softirq.c @@ -759,6 +759,7 @@ static void run_ksoftirqd(unsigned int cpu) { local_irq_disable(); if (local_softirq_pending()) { + /* No need to use softirq stack here */ __do_softirq(); rcu_note_context_switch(cpu); local_irq_enable(); -- 1.7.5.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
