On 09/12/2013 12:01 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 12 September 2013 11:51, Srivatsa S. Bhat > <[email protected]> wrote: >> That said, indeed currently there is no code in cpufreq that invokes the >> function with last == new. So its not like we are masking an existing bug >> with >> this patch. If you like, perhaps we can change this patch to print a warning >> when it gets input values with last == new? That prevents disasters and also >> warns when some code is buggy. Sounds like a win-win. > > Exactly what I thought while I was midway reading your mail :) > Probably a WARN().. So that we don't miss any other bugs :) >
Looking at the rate at which we are bumping into each others thoughts, I think maybe we should switch from email to IRC ;-) ;-) Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
