On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:42:18PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> Hello Mel
> 
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Mel Gorman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > +       struct numa_group *grp = p->numa_group;
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       kfree(p->numa_faults);
> > +
> > +       if (grp) {
> > +               for (i = 0; i < 2*nr_node_ids; i++)
> > +                       atomic_long_sub(p->numa_faults[i], &grp->faults[i]);
> > +
> use after free, numa_faults ;/
> 

It gets fixed in the patch "sched: numa: use group fault statistics in
numa placement" but I agree that it's the wrong place to fix it.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to