On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Russell King <r...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 07:53:21AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> I'm not an ARM expert, so I don't know if ARM should use the
>> asm-generic implementations, or just use __get_user/__put_user in all
>> cases. I've CC'd rmk.
>
> Why do we have uaccess-unaligned.h ? Normally, these kinds of things
> are spawned by architectures which have problems with unaligned accesses,
> ARM being one of them, but afaik we've never need this.
>
> With the kernel-side trapping of unaligned accesses on older hardware,
> we've always dealt with the normal accessor faulting.
>
> From what I can tell in the git history, these unaligned put_user and
> get_user have existed all the way back to the dawn of git use.
>
> Can someone enlighten me why we have them?
You removed the answer when trimming the quoted part:
| "Btrfs is the first user of __put_user_unaligned() outside the compat code,
__put_user_unaligned() is used in fs/compat.c, presumably because
alignment restrictions may differ between 32- and 64-bit versions of the
same CPU family.
No one seems to actully use __get_user_unaligned().
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
