On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 02:20:28PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > On 09/21/2013 02:22 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:53:44PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > >>With arch/arm calling of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init(), we can now > > >>remove custom .init_time hooks. While at it, also remove some obsolete > > >>includes. > > >> > > >>Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com> > > >>--- > > >>Cc: Olof Johansson <o...@lixom.net> > > >>Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > >>Cc: Jason Cooper <ja...@lakedaemon.net> > > >>Cc: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> > > >>Cc: Russell King <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> > > >>Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > > >>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > >>--- > > >> arch/arm/mach-dove/board-dt.c | 11 ----------- > > >> 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) > > [...] > > >Boot tested on cubox. > > > > > >Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> > > > > Thanks Andrew! > > > > Aren't you giving any Acks for dove/kirkwood anymore? > > Hi Sebastian > > In my opinion, a Tested-by: has more weight than an Acked-by. I could > of given you an Acked-by in about 60 seconds, given the simplicity of > the patch. It took a lot more effort to get your tree, build it, fix > my binutils, since it was the first 3.12 tree i had tried and my > binutils was too old, and boot it.
I would even go so far as to say that a Tested-by: from a maintainer carries an implied Ack. ;-) And, just for the record, Acked-by: Jason Cooper <ja...@lakedaemon.net> thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
