On 09/23/2013 03:32 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 02:20:28PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 09/21/2013 02:22 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:53:44PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
With arch/arm calling of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init(), we can now
remove custom .init_time hooks. While at it, also remove some obsolete
includes.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com>
---
Cc: Olof Johansson <o...@lixom.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <ja...@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
Cc: Russell King <li...@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/arm/mach-dove/board-dt.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
[...]
Boot tested on cubox.
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
Thanks Andrew!
Aren't you giving any Acks for dove/kirkwood anymore?
Hi Sebastian
In my opinion, a Tested-by: has more weight than an Acked-by. I could
of given you an Acked-by in about 60 seconds, given the simplicity of
the patch. It took a lot more effort to get your tree, build it, fix
my binutils, since it was the first 3.12 tree i had tried and my
binutils was too old, and boot it.
I would even go so far as to say that a Tested-by: from a maintainer
carries an implied Ack. ;-)
And, just for the record,
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <ja...@lakedaemon.net>
True, True, True. Lesson learned ;)
Thanks for both testing and ack'ing.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
