On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:29:41 +0800 Wanpeng Li <liw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> to set it again in __vmalloc_area_node. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyan...@cn.fujitsu.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >> --- > >> mm/vmalloc.c | 1 - > >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > >> index 1074543..d78d117 100644 > >> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > >> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > >> @@ -1566,7 +1566,6 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct > >> *area, gfp_t gfp_mask, > >> pages = kmalloc_node(array_size, nested_gfp, node); > >> } > >> area->pages = pages; > >> - area->caller = caller; > >> if (!area->pages) { > >> remove_vm_area(area->addr); > >> kfree(area); > > > >Then, __vmalloc_area_node() no longer need "caller" argument. It can use > >area->caller instead. > > > > Thanks for pointing out, I will update it in next version. I've seen so many versions of this patchset that my head has spun right off. I'm not at all confident that I have the latest version and I'm certainly not confident that I've kept up with the ack/nack trail. So I think I'll drop everything and will await that "next version". Please be careful to Cc everyone who was involved and that the acked/reviewed-by paperwork is up to date. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/