On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, James Morris wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> > This LSM enforces that modules must all come from the same filesystem,
> > with the expectation that such a filesystem is backed by a read-only
> > device such as dm-verity or CDROM. This allows systems that have a
> > verified or unchanging filesystem to enforce module loading restrictions
> > without needing to sign the modules individually.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> 
> Are you using this for ChromeOS?

Also, you should CC Rusty on this.


> 
> 
> > ---
> >  security/Kconfig         |    6 ++
> >  security/Makefile        |    2 +
> >  security/modpin/Kconfig  |    9 +++
> >  security/modpin/Makefile |    1 +
> >  security/modpin/modpin.c |  197 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 215 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 security/modpin/Kconfig
> >  create mode 100644 security/modpin/Makefile
> >  create mode 100644 security/modpin/modpin.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
> > index e9c6ac7..80172fd 100644
> > --- a/security/Kconfig
> > +++ b/security/Kconfig
> > @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ source security/selinux/Kconfig
> >  source security/smack/Kconfig
> >  source security/tomoyo/Kconfig
> >  source security/apparmor/Kconfig
> > +source security/modpin/Kconfig
> >  source security/yama/Kconfig
> >  
> >  source security/integrity/Kconfig
> > @@ -131,6 +132,7 @@ choice
> >     default DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK if SECURITY_SMACK
> >     default DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO if SECURITY_TOMOYO
> >     default DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR if SECURITY_APPARMOR
> > +   default DEFAULT_SECURITY_MODPIN if SECURITY_MODPIN
> >     default DEFAULT_SECURITY_YAMA if SECURITY_YAMA
> >     default DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
> >  
> > @@ -150,6 +152,9 @@ choice
> >     config DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
> >             bool "AppArmor" if SECURITY_APPARMOR=y
> >  
> > +   config DEFAULT_SECURITY_MODPIN
> > +           bool "ModPin" if SECURITY_MODPIN=y
> > +
> >     config DEFAULT_SECURITY_YAMA
> >             bool "Yama" if SECURITY_YAMA=y
> >  
> > @@ -164,6 +169,7 @@ config DEFAULT_SECURITY
> >     default "smack" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
> >     default "tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
> >     default "apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
> > +   default "modpin" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_MODPIN
> >     default "yama" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_YAMA
> >     default "" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
> >  
> > diff --git a/security/Makefile b/security/Makefile
> > index c26c81e..73d0a05 100644
> > --- a/security/Makefile
> > +++ b/security/Makefile
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX)   += selinux
> >  subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK)            += smack
> >  subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO)        += tomoyo
> >  subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR) += apparmor
> > +subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_MODPIN)   += modpin
> >  subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA)             += yama
> >  
> >  # always enable default capabilities
> > @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK)              += 
> > smack/built-in.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT)                        += lsm_audit.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO)              += tomoyo/built-in.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR)            += apparmor/built-in.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_MODPIN)              += modpin/built-in.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA)                += yama/built-in.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE)                += device_cgroup.o
> >  
> > diff --git a/security/modpin/Kconfig b/security/modpin/Kconfig
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..5be9dd5
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/security/modpin/Kconfig
> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> > +config SECURITY_MODPIN
> > +   bool "Module filesystem origin pinning"
> > +   depends on SECURITY
> > +   help
> > +     Module loading will be pinned to the first filesystem used for
> > +     loading. Any modules that come from other filesystems will be
> > +     rejected. This is best used on systems without an initrd that
> > +     have a root filesystem backed by a read-only device such as
> > +     dm-verity or a CDROM.
> > diff --git a/security/modpin/Makefile b/security/modpin/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..9080b29
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/security/modpin/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_MODPIN) += modpin.o
> > diff --git a/security/modpin/modpin.c b/security/modpin/modpin.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..107b4d8
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/security/modpin/modpin.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Module Pinning Security Module
> > + *
> > + * Copyright 2011-2013 Google Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Authors:
> > + *      Kees Cook       <keesc...@chromium.org>
> > + *
> > + * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> > + * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and
> > + * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms.
> > + *
> > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ModPin LSM: " fmt
> > +
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/security.h>
> > +#include <linux/sched.h>
> > +#include <linux/fs.h>
> > +#include <linux/fs_struct.h>
> > +#include <linux/mount.h>
> > +#include <linux/path.h>
> > +#include <linux/root_dev.h>
> > +
> > +static void report_load_module(struct path *path, char *operation)
> > +{
> > +   char *alloced = NULL;
> > +   char *pathname; /* Pointer to either static string or "alloced". */
> > +
> > +   if (!path)
> > +           pathname = "<unknown>";
> > +   else {
> > +           /* We will allow 11 spaces for ' (deleted)' to be appended */
> > +           alloced = pathname = kmalloc(PATH_MAX+11, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +           if (!pathname)
> > +                   pathname = "<no_memory>";
> > +           else {
> > +                   pathname = d_path(path, pathname, PATH_MAX+11);
> > +                   if (IS_ERR(pathname))
> > +                           pathname = "<too_long>";
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   pr_notice("init_module %s module=%s pid=%d\n",
> > +             operation, pathname, task_pid_nr(current));
> > +
> > +   kfree(alloced);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int modpin_enforced = 1;
> > +static struct dentry *pinned_root;
> > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pinned_root_spinlock);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> > +static int zero;
> > +static int one = 1;
> > +
> > +static struct ctl_path modpin_sysctl_path[] = {
> > +   { .procname = "kernel", },
> > +   { .procname = "modpin", },
> > +   { }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct ctl_table modpin_sysctl_table[] = {
> > +   {
> > +           .procname       = "enforced",
> > +           .data           = &modpin_enforced,
> > +           .maxlen         = sizeof(int),
> > +           .mode           = 0644,
> > +           .proc_handler   = proc_dointvec_minmax,
> > +           .extra1         = &zero,
> > +           .extra2         = &one,
> > +   },
> > +   { }
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Check if the root device is read-only (e.g. dm-verity is enabled).
> > + * This must be called after early kernel init, since only then is the
> > + * rootdev available.
> > + */
> > +static bool rootdev_readonly(void)
> > +{
> > +   bool rc;
> > +   struct block_device *bdev;
> > +   const fmode_t mode = FMODE_WRITE;
> > +
> > +   bdev = blkdev_get_by_dev(ROOT_DEV, mode, NULL);
> > +   if (IS_ERR(bdev)) {
> > +           /* In this weird case, assume it is read-only. */
> > +           pr_info("dev(%u,%u): FMODE_WRITE disallowed?!\n",
> > +                   MAJOR(ROOT_DEV), MINOR(ROOT_DEV));
> > +           return true;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   rc = bdev_read_only(bdev);
> > +   blkdev_put(bdev, mode);
> > +
> > +   pr_info("dev(%u,%u): %s\n", MAJOR(ROOT_DEV), MINOR(ROOT_DEV),
> > +           rc ? "read-only" : "writable");
> > +
> > +   return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void check_pinning_enforcement(void)
> > +{
> > +   /*
> > +    * If module pinning is not being enforced, allow sysctl to change
> > +    * modes for testing.
> > +    */
> > +   if (!rootdev_readonly()) {
> > +           if (!register_sysctl_paths(modpin_sysctl_path,
> > +                                      modpin_sysctl_table))
> > +                   pr_notice("sysctl registration failed!\n");
> > +           else
> > +                   pr_info("module pinning can be disabled.\n");
> > +   } else
> > +           pr_info("module pinning engaged.\n");
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static void check_pinning_enforcement(void) { }
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +
> > +static int modpin_load_module(struct file *file)
> > +{
> > +   struct dentry *module_root;
> > +
> > +   if (!file) {
> > +           if (!modpin_enforced) {
> > +                   report_load_module(NULL, "old-api-pinning-ignored");
> > +                   return 0;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           report_load_module(NULL, "old-api-denied");
> > +           return -EPERM;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   module_root = file->f_path.mnt->mnt_root;
> > +
> > +   /* First loaded module defines the root for all others. */
> > +   spin_lock(&pinned_root_spinlock);
> > +   if (!pinned_root) {
> > +           pinned_root = dget(module_root);
> > +           /*
> > +            * Unlock now since it's only pinned_root we care about.
> > +            * In the worst case, we will (correctly) report pinning
> > +            * failures before we have announced that pinning is
> > +            * enabled. This would be purely cosmetic.
> > +            */
> > +           spin_unlock(&pinned_root_spinlock);
> > +           check_pinning_enforcement();
> > +           report_load_module(&file->f_path, "pinned");
> > +           return 0;
> > +   }
> > +   spin_unlock(&pinned_root_spinlock);
> > +
> > +   if (module_root != pinned_root) {
> > +           if (unlikely(!modpin_enforced)) {
> > +                   report_load_module(&file->f_path, "pinning-ignored");
> > +                   return 0;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           report_load_module(&file->f_path, "denied");
> > +           return -EPERM;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct security_operations modpin_ops = {
> > +   .name   = "modpin",
> > +   .kernel_module_from_file = modpin_load_module,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init modpin_init(void)
> > +{
> > +   int error;
> > +
> > +   error = register_security(&modpin_ops);
> > +
> > +   if (error)
> > +           panic("Could not register ModPin security module");
> > +
> > +   pr_info("ready to pin.\n");
> > +
> > +   return error;
> > +}
> > +security_initcall(modpin_init);
> > +
> > +module_param(modpin_enforced, int, S_IRUSR);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(modpin_enforced, "Module pinning enforced (default: 
> > true)");
> > -- 
> > 1.7.9.5
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Kees Cook
> > Chrome OS Security
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > 
> 
> -- 
> James Morris
> <jmor...@namei.org>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
James Morris
<jmor...@namei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to