On 09/25/2013 09:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:06:52AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >> OK, I see, the 'root cause' is: "you are not the related maintainer >> either", so it is really necessary for me to spend additional time >> resource on it :-(. > > Yeah, at least partly. That and the fact that I'm not too willing to > dig into the code without further evidence. It isn't anything strange > to ask tho and I'm likely to do that even for subsystems that I know > intimately if the subject code has been stable / stale for years and > the analysis doesn't seem immediately convincing. And, if my > experience is anything to go by, it's not too unlikely that you might > hit something which doesn't agree with your current assumptions while > trying to actually trigger the problem. > > Thanks. >
Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I do not quite understand what you said (but it seems what you said is reasonable, and not need reply). Thanks. -- Chen Gang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
