On 09/25/2013 09:47 AM, Chen Gang wrote: > On 09/25/2013 09:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:06:52AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >>> OK, I see, the 'root cause' is: "you are not the related maintainer >>> either", so it is really necessary for me to spend additional time >>> resource on it :-(. >> >> Yeah, at least partly. That and the fact that I'm not too willing to >> dig into the code without further evidence. It isn't anything strange >> to ask tho and I'm likely to do that even for subsystems that I know >> intimately if the subject code has been stable / stale for years and >> the analysis doesn't seem immediately convincing. And, if my >> experience is anything to go by, it's not too unlikely that you might >> hit something which doesn't agree with your current assumptions while >> trying to actually trigger the problem. >> >> Thanks. >> >
Excuse me, I have to do some urgent internal things within my company, so the test and confirmation may be delayed (I will try to finish test within this month: 2013-09-30). > Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I do not quite understand what > you said (but it seems what you said is reasonable, and not need reply). > > > Thanks. > -- Chen Gang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
