On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Michael Opdenacker
> <michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from m68k architecture
>> code. It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> BTW, 2 years ago Yong Zhang sent 3 big versions of series removing
> IRQF_DISABLED everywhere.
> At that time, I had hoped they would all go in through tglx:
>
> | > But do you expect the individual
> | > maintainers to take these patches, or are you just collecting Acks?
> |
> | Quoted from Thomas's reply to Ralf (MIPS):
> | [ We can hold off the "remove the define" patch until 3.2-rc1 and push
> | it along with everything which hasn't been merged until then.
>
> but apparently that never happened... oh well...
>
> Anyway, will queue if nothing happens at the global front...
Queued for 3.13.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
