Hi Magnus,
Thank you for your commnets.

> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SHMOBILE)    += shmobile/
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SHMOBILE_MULTI)      += shmobile/
> 
> Here I believe it is enough that you only use
> CONFIG_ARCH_SHMOBILE_MULTI. ...

That is because it supports three configuration,
1. MULTI + KZM9D_REFERENCE + COMMON_CLK
2. KZM9D_REFERENCE + COMMON_CLK
3. KZM9D
but,

> ... Building common clocks to coexist with the
> old legacy board code does not make any sense IMO. ...
I think so, too.
And from the view of testing, having smaller variants is better.
# easier :)

> > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK), y)
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EMEV2)       += clk-emev2.o
> > +endif
> 
> I don't think you would need the above ifeq/endif wrapper if you only
> used CONFIG_ARCH_SHMOBILE_MULTI above.
Right.

Anyway, because you have make kzm9d-reference things simpler,
now we don't need to worry about it.

Thanks,
/yoshii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to