3.5.7.23 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl> commit 3f1f33206c16c7b3839d71372bc2ac3f305aa802 upstream. Stephane thought the perf_cpu_context::active_pmu name confusing and suggested using 'unique_pmu' instead. This pointer is a pointer to a 'random' pmu sharing the cpuctx instance, therefore limiting a for_each_pmu loop to those where cpuctx->unique_pmu matches the pmu we get a loop over unique cpuctx instances. Suggested-by: Stephane Eranian <eran...@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kxyjqpfj2fn9gt7kwu5ag...@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> Cc: Li Zefan <lize...@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriq...@canonical.com> --- include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +- kernel/events/core.c | 12 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h index c65c7d1..3faf0d4 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ struct perf_cpu_context { int exclusive; struct list_head rotation_list; int jiffies_interval; - struct pmu *active_pmu; + struct pmu *unique_pmu; struct perf_cgroup *cgrp; }; diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index dd815c3..b3a6de5 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -4331,7 +4331,7 @@ static void perf_event_task_event(struct perf_task_event *task_event) rcu_read_lock(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) { cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context); - if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu) + if (cpuctx->unique_pmu != pmu) goto next; perf_event_task_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, task_event); @@ -4477,7 +4477,7 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct perf_comm_event *comm_event) rcu_read_lock(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) { cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context); - if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu) + if (cpuctx->unique_pmu != pmu) goto next; perf_event_comm_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, comm_event); @@ -4673,7 +4673,7 @@ got_name: rcu_read_lock(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) { cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context); - if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu) + if (cpuctx->unique_pmu != pmu) goto next; perf_event_mmap_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, mmap_event, vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC); @@ -5748,8 +5748,8 @@ static void update_pmu_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct pmu *old_pmu) cpuctx = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context, cpu); - if (cpuctx->active_pmu == old_pmu) - cpuctx->active_pmu = pmu; + if (cpuctx->unique_pmu == old_pmu) + cpuctx->unique_pmu = pmu; } } @@ -5885,7 +5885,7 @@ skip_type: cpuctx->ctx.pmu = pmu; cpuctx->jiffies_interval = 1; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpuctx->rotation_list); - cpuctx->active_pmu = pmu; + cpuctx->unique_pmu = pmu; } got_cpu_context: -- 1.8.3.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
