* Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 10:35 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:47:23PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > ip4_datagram_connect is called with BH processing enabled. Therefore
> > > we cannot use IP_INC_STATS_BH but must use IP_INC_STATS which disables
> > > BH handling before incrementing the counter.
> > >
> > > The following trace is triggered without this patch:
> > >
> > > [ 9293.806634] __this_cpu_add operation in preemptible [00000000] code:
> > > ntpd/2150
> >
> > You lost the BUG there; that really needs to be there:
> >
> > - BUG makes people pay attention
> > - This was an actual BUG wasn't it?
> >
> > Sure there can be false positives, but in all cases people should
> > amend the code. Sometimes with a comment explaining why the raw
> > primitive should be used; sometimes to fix an actual bug, but a patch
> > needs to be written. Therefore BUG!
>
> Yep this is a real BUG for linux 2.6.36+ on 32bit arches,
>
> The effect of this bug is that on 32bit arches, we might corrupt a
> seqcount : Later, we can spin forever on it.
Ouch, that's a pretty serious bug ...
The patch title should reflect this fact.
> In linux 2.6.36 we converted IP mib from 32 to 64 bits, therefore this
> fix should be backported up to 2.6.36
>
> Prior to 2.6.36, the bug was that some increments of SNMP stat could be
> lost, because two cpus could access the same location, hardly a
> problem...
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
