On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> NAK; smp_processor_id() has the preemption checks; for consistently > numa_node_id() should have them too, for the very same reason. Who's to > say the node id is still valid when you return from this function? If > we're preemptable we could've just been migrated away to another node. > > So please introduce raw_numa_node_id() and use that; all fully analogous > to smp_processor_id(). The code that was here before the use of this_cpu ops did use raw_smp_processor_id. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
