Commit-ID: 7c3f2ab7b844f1a859afbc3d41925e8a0faba5fa Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/7c3f2ab7b844f1a859afbc3d41925e8a0faba5fa Author: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> AuthorDate: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:35:07 +0200 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> CommitDate: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:22:13 +0200
sched/rt: Add missing rmb() While discussing the proposed SCHED_DEADLINE patches which in parts mimic the existing FIFO code it was noticed that the wmb in rt_set_overloaded() didn't have a matching barrier. The only site using rt_overloaded() to test the rto_count is pull_rt_task() and we should issue a matching rmb before then assuming there's an rto_mask bit set. Without that smp_rmb() in there we could actually miss seeing the rto_mask bit. Also, change to using smp_[wr]mb(), even though this is SMP only code; memory barriers without smp_ always make me think they're against hardware of some sort. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> Cc: vincent.guit...@linaro.org Cc: luca.ab...@unitn.it Cc: bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com Cc: dhaval.gi...@gmail.com Cc: rost...@goodmis.org Cc: hgu1...@gmail.com Cc: o...@redhat.com Cc: fweis...@gmail.com Cc: dar...@dvhart.com Cc: johan.e...@ericsson.com Cc: p.fa...@akatech.ch Cc: paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: raist...@linux.it Cc: clau...@evidence.eu.com Cc: insop.s...@gmail.com Cc: mich...@amarulasolutions.com Cc: liming.w...@windriver.com Cc: fchecc...@gmail.com Cc: jka...@redhat.com Cc: tommaso.cucino...@sssup.it Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@gmail.com> Cc: harald.gustafs...@ericsson.com Cc: nicola.man...@disi.unitn.it Cc: t...@linutronix.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131015103507.gf10...@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/rt.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index e9304cd..a848f52 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -246,8 +246,10 @@ static inline void rt_set_overload(struct rq *rq) * if we should look at the mask. It would be a shame * if we looked at the mask, but the mask was not * updated yet. + * + * Matched by the barrier in pull_rt_task(). */ - wmb(); + smp_wmb(); atomic_inc(&rq->rd->rto_count); } @@ -1626,6 +1628,12 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) if (likely(!rt_overloaded(this_rq))) return 0; + /* + * Match the barrier from rt_set_overloaded; this guarantees that if we + * see overloaded we must also see the rto_mask bit. + */ + smp_rmb(); + for_each_cpu(cpu, this_rq->rd->rto_mask) { if (this_cpu == cpu) continue; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
