2013/10/25 David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>: > On 10/25/13 7:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> >> Em Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:56:31AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu: >>> >>> 2013/10/11 Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>: >>>> >>>> From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> This new comm infrastructure provides two features: >> >> >>> I was wondering about the fate of these patches. I can resend these or >>> do any rebase if you need to. >> >> >> So I applied the first few patches, but deferred working on this part, >> the comm one, because Jiri Olsa had some problems with it, IIRC, Jiri? >> Can you refresh my mind and ellaborate on it? > > > I also saw some comm related problems with Namhyung's tree. Not sure if it > contained all of Frederic's patches. I have not had time to chase down what > is going on -- just that comm's coming out of perf-script were not correct.
Oh I see. It's possible that my massive conversion to use the comm accessor got blind at some point and left over a few things. I remember that I only lightly tested that new comm infrastructure. I mean I tested a lot of "perf report -s foo,bar" combinations for performance comparisons but I haven't tested the perf script and all the other perf tools. I'll rebase these patches and test that wider before resending. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/