* Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> On 26.10.13 at 12:31, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > * Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I'd like to point out though that with __compiletime_object_size()
> >> being restricted to gcc before 4.6, the whole construct is going to
> >> become more and more pointless going forward. I would question
> >> however that commit 2fb0815c9ee6b9ac50e15dd8360ec76d9fa46a2 ("gcc4:
> >> disable __compiletime_object_size for GCC 4.6+") was really necessary,
> >> and instead this should have been dealt with as is done here from the
> >> beginning.
> >
> > Can we now revert 2fb0815c9ee6?
>
> Afaict yes, but I certainly didn't test with all possible gcc
> versions. So minimally everyone involved in getting that change in
> would be good to be in agreement.
Mind submitting a patch? I can keep it pending until v3.14, that
should give time for compiler dependencies to be caught. Even if it
breaks anything it shouldn't be too hard to revert again ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
