On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:56:10PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
SNIP
> * double accounting.
> @@ -501,8 +528,29 @@ iter_add_next_cumulative_entry(struct add_entry_iter
> *iter,
> {
> struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel;
> struct perf_sample *sample = iter->sample;
> + struct cumulative_cache *ccache = iter->priv;
> struct hist_entry *he;
> int err = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + /*
> + * Check if there's duplicate entries in the callchain.
> + * It's possible that it has cycles or recursive calls.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < iter->curr; i++) {
> + if (sort__has_sym) {
> + if (ccache[i].sym == al->sym)
> + return 0;
> + } else {
> + /* Not much we can do - just compare the dso. */
> + if (ccache[i].dso == al->map->dso)
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
hum, do we want to prevent recursion totaly?
how about intended recursion?
also should the dso be checked together with sym?
because the symbol is defined like dso::sym
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
