On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 04:07:22PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Rodrigo, > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:13:34 +0000, Rodrigo Campos wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:56:10PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > I think the right fix is assigning "iter->priv = NULL" as you said. But > I changed this patch a bit for v3 so need to check it again.
Btw, that would have a race condition if this is run on multiple threads (I mean, if different threads can free the same "iter->prev" pointer), at least if we do it just assigning NULL after the free(). But maybe that's not an issue ? Thanks a lot, Rodrigo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
