On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:07:37PM +0000, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c |  109 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> index cea1594..e60dae3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_event * [ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS], hw_events);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [BITS_TO_LONGS(ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS)], 
> used_mask);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pmu_hw_events, cpu_hw_events);
> +static bool is_percpuirq;

This isn't a global property; it should be part of the struct arm_pmu.
The rest of the patch looks ok, but obvious requires you to merge the core
changes first.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to