On Thursday 14 November 2013 07:57 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > I am guessing this is a little too early for restarting policy here > considering syscore_ops->resume is pretty early..
Yeah, looks like that.. > http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3602746 is the equivalent patch for v3.12 > http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3602747 is the result. Can you try this instead of last diff I sent? diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index dc67fa0..e70e906 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1324,6 +1324,15 @@ static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work) container_of(work, struct cpufreq_policy, update); unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; pr_debug("handle_update for cpu %u called\n", cpu); + + if (has_target() && !policy->governor_enabled) { + if ((ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) || + (ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS))) { + pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__); + goto fail; + } + } + cpufreq_update_policy(cpu); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
