arch/what again?
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote:
>On 14 November 2013 16:29, Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
>wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:19:35AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> +ssize_t arch_print_cpu_modalias(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buf)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned int caps;
>>> + ssize_t n;
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * With 32 features maximum (taking 5 bytes each to print), we
>don't
>>> + * need to worry about overrunning the PAGE_SIZE sized buffer.
>>> + */
>>> + n = sprintf(buf, "cpu:type:arm64:feature:");
>>
>> I would use "aarch64" here instead of arm64 for consistency with the
>> architecture mode, compiler triplet and ELF_PLATFORM definition in
>the
>> kernel.
>
>OK, I will change that.
>
>Regards,
>Ard,
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
