On 18/11/13 23:15, David Ahern wrote: > On 11/18/13, 2:55 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> Long options can be negated by prefixing them >> with 'no-'. However options that already start >> with 'no-', such as '--no-inherit' result in ugly >> double 'no's. Avoid that by accepting that the >> removal of 'no-' also negates the long option. >> > > Why not cleanup the options for the commands and move all of the no-xxxx to > just xxxx? Anyone using no-xxxx would still just work by the existing code.
Interesting idea but the short and long options are a combination, and short options don't work the same way e.g. -i and --no-inherit go together. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
