On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:25:24AM +0800, Peng Tao wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:04:56AM +0800, Peng Tao wrote: > >> From: Mikhail Pershin <mike.pers...@intel.com> > >> > >> MGC uses lvfs API to access local llogs blocking removal of old code > >> > >> - MGS is converted to use OSD API for local llogs > >> - llog_is_empty() and llog_backup() are introduced > >> - initial OSD start initialize run ctxt so llog can use it too > >> - shrink dcache after initial scrub in osd-ldiskfs to avoid holding > >> data of unlinked objects until umount. > > > > It is not checkpatch clean :( > > > > Come on, it's not hard to do this yourself, why do you make me find > > these errors for you? It does nothing but make me not want to look at > > lustre patches for a long time... > > Strange. I did run checkpatch before sending the patchset out. > > Just tried again. Still pass. > > [X61@linux-lustre]$./scripts/checkpatch.pl > 0002-staging-lustre-llog-MGC-to-use-OSD-API-for-backup-lo.patch total: > 0 errors, 0 warnings, 883 lines checked > > 0002-staging-lustre-llog-MGC-to-use-OSD-API-for-backup-lo.patch has no > obvious style problems and is ready for submission. > > What message did you see?
One about return(); greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
