On 11/26/2013 11:30 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:05:02AM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
From: JC Lafoucriere <jacques-charles.lafoucri...@cea.fr>
To move data with external storage, HSM coordinator
uses a Copy Tool running on a client named agent.
This patch implements the interface for these agents.
Interesting text here...
Lustre-change: http://review.whamcloud.com/6534
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3342
Signed-off-by: JC Lafoucriere <jacques-charles.lafoucri...@cea.fr>
Reviewed-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xi...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dil...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John L. Hammond <john.hamm...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.dro...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergw...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dil...@intel.com>
---
.../lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_user.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_user.h
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_user.h
index 9436166..631f026 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_user.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_user.h
@@ -428,8 +428,8 @@ struct obd_uuid {
char uuid[UUID_MAX];
};
-static inline int obd_uuid_equals(const struct obd_uuid *u1,
- const struct obd_uuid *u2)
+static inline bool obd_uuid_equals(const struct obd_uuid *u1,
+ const struct obd_uuid *u2)
{
return strcmp((char *)u1->uuid, (char *)u2->uuid) == 0;
}
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static inline void obd_str2uuid(struct obd_uuid *uuid,
const char *tmp)
}
/* For printf's only, make sure uuid is terminated */
-static inline char *obd_uuid2str(struct obd_uuid *uuid)
+static inline char *obd_uuid2str(const struct obd_uuid *uuid)
{
if (uuid->uuid[sizeof(*uuid) - 1] != '\0') {
/* Obviously not safe, but for printfs, no real harm done...
Too bad it doesn't describe the changes made in the code at all.
How can so many people review a patch that is not the same as what it
says it really is?
The main part of the original commit is dropped as it only touches
server code. I should have modified the commit message to say what
exactly the patch does rather than just copying the original commit
message. I'll fix up. Sorry.
I'm stopping here in the series, sorry. Please fix up and resend the
rest when you can.
Will do. Thanks for reviewing!
Thanks,
Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/