____call_usermodehelper() does set_cpus_allowed_ptr(cpu_all_mask),
this (and the comment) is misleading. We no longer have keventd_wq,
and kmod.c switched to khelper_wq a long ago.

And more importantly, "unlike our parent" is no longer true too,
this thread was created by WQ_UNBOUND worker thread which has the
full ->cpus_allowed mask, so this set_cpus_allowed_ptr() is simply
unnecessary.

Perhaps we will change this later, so that userspace can control
the affinity of the usermode helper tasks, but this is yet another
reason to remove this set_cpus_allowed_ptr().

To some degree this also applies to set_user_nice(), but this
patch only updates the comment.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/kmod.c |    8 ++------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c
index b086006..2fe4544 100644
--- a/kernel/kmod.c
+++ b/kernel/kmod.c
@@ -208,13 +208,9 @@ static int ____call_usermodehelper(void *data)
        spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
        flush_signal_handlers(current, 1);
        spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-
-       /* We can run anywhere, unlike our parent keventd(). */
-       set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpu_all_mask);
-
        /*
-        * Our parent is keventd, which runs with elevated scheduling priority.
-        * Avoid propagating that into the userspace child.
+        * Our parent is a workqueue thread, which can run with elevated
+        * scheduling priority. Avoid propagating that into the userspace.
         */
        set_user_nice(current, 0);
 
-- 
1.5.5.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to